ABSTRACT
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Controversy on whether patients should receive radical surgery after pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has remained since pCR patients have shown favorable long-term outcome. Progress in multidisciplinary modalities has been made, including MRI, PET/CT imaging studies, genetic expression profiling, etc. The methods of predicting pCR response are inspiring. In this article, we review the methods for prediction and prognostic effect of pCR response when patients with locally advanced rectal cancer are treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Subject(s)
Humans , Chemoradiotherapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Rectal Neoplasms , Therapeutics , Remission Induction , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of postoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients who reached pathological ypT1-4N0 after neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We performed a retrospective study of 104 patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by radical resection, who achieved pathological ypT1-4N0, between Mar 2003 and Dec 2010. There were 73 patients who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and the other 31 patients did not. The distribution of final pathologic stages for these patients was ypT1-2N0 in 39 cases and ypT3-4N0 in 65 cases.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The median follow-up was 41 months. The 3-year overall survival rate (OS) and recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) for the whole group (ypT1-4N0) were 93.4% and 85.3%, respectively. The 3-year OS and RFS in the adjuvant chemotherapy group and non-adjuvant chemotherapy group were 95.5%, 88.6% and 88.6%, 77.2%, respectively. There were no significant differences in 3-year RFS (P = 0.108) and OS (P = 0.106) between the two groups. The 3-year local recurrence and distant metastasis rates in the adjuvant chemotherapy group were 4.1% (3/73) and 5.5% (4/73), while for the non-adjuvant chemotherapy group, the 3-year local recurrence rate and distant metastasis rate were 3.2% (1/31) and 16.1% (5/31), respectively. Significant difference was found in distant metastasis rates (P = 0.030) between the two groups, but not in local recurrence rates (P = 0.676).Further subgroup analysis indicated that for the ypT1-2N0 patients, there were no significant differences in 3-year OS (P = 0.296) and RFS (P = 0.939) between the adjuvant and non-adjuvant chemotherapy groups, while negative results displayed in 3-year local recurrence rates (P = 0.676) and distant metastasis rates (P = 0.414). However, for patients with ypT3-4N0, significant differences were showed in both the 3-year OS (P = 0.034) and RFS (P = 0.025), and further analysis revealed that the 3-year distant metastasis rate was significantly higher in the non-adjuvant chemotherapy group than in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (P = 0.010) , but with non-significant difference in the 3-year local recurrence (P = 0.548).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Adjuvant chemotherapy may not improve survival for ypT1-2N0 patients. However, it may be clinically meaningful for ypT3-4N0 patients by decreasing distant metastasis rate. Further randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm our results.</p>